P R O P O S A L  :

 

October 10, 1986

 

To:       Adelphi Directors

 

From:   Robert Machiz

 

Subject:       Reformation Plan

 

Objective: The objectives of the reformation plan are to allow TAO to move forward with its mission by:

 

1.        clarifying the direction of TAO and the Adelphi community

2.        protecting the organization’s tax-exemption status

3.        restoring the integrity of TAO’s democratic principles.

 

Present Situation:   The organization is reeling from the recent disclosure concerning Richard’s activity. The organization needs to deal with the various legal and organizational issues confronting it; however, the present focus is still “Richard-oriented.” Richard is still involving himself in the process and this, whether his intention or not, serves to obfuscate the issues.

 

In the past TAO has talked about itself as a democratic organization and yet we find that Richard was the sole authority in three key areas: Land trustee, Philadelphia Fund trustee, and head of Admissions. In these capacities he was not accountable to anyone including the membership.

 

Proposal:     That the board adopt and implement a reformation plan and present this reformation plan at the next TAO meeting. The plan could be modified on the basis of group input but the intention is to indicate that the organization is moving forward. The components of the reformation plan are:

 

1.  Affirm that Richard has already resigned and the board is operating from that understanding. Members may want to open this for discussion (after the presentation of the entire plan).

 

2.  Create six committees each with a carefully worded charter and each with a task deadline. The three committees are:

 

a.  Bylaws: Consists of the directors and two appointees by the board. Their purpose is to identify areas of the bylaws that are trouble and to recommend a solution. The exact wording should be by Bill Elliott.

 

b.  Direction: Consists of seven people including one or two directors with the rest appointed by them. Their purpose is to make recommendations on the general direction of the community and the or organization. Possibly re-submit the Actualizing Adelphi ‘86 Commit report that was made before Richard’s deletions.

 

c.  Programs: Consists of five people including one or two directors with the rest appointed by them. Their purpose would be to make recommendations on program areas to support the tax exempt purpose.

 

d.  Philadelphia Fund and Land Trust: The board of directors would be this committee. Their purpose would be to develop a plan to liquidate or terminate the trusts and place the corpus under the control of the organization for proper disposition.

 

e. Restitution: The board of directors and two others will serve on this committee. Their purpose is to negotiate with Richard to recover all corporate assets including the $3,000 short fall from the sale of Lot 123 and the excess salary-stipend paid as a result of his failure to disclose the Rasche payments.

 

The board should also indicate their desires on who should serve on each of the committees prior to presenting this. The committees would have three weeks to make their recommendations.

 

All recommendations would be made to the board who may adopt or modify them. Once adopted, the recommendations will be presented to the group for input prior to implementation.

 

I recommend that the board adopt the attitude that it is time to move forward and to take affirmative steps in a way that allows members input. The objective is to restore TAO as a democracy in a more true sense.

 

The plan does not preclude the expression of feelings and concerns that different members have toward what has happened. The intention is to separate the substantive issues from personalities—to separate business from emotions. I suggest that feelings and such be discussed under a more therapeutic environment that is free from the charge created by the business issues. In this case, ground rules for people to express themselves with more satisfaction can be developed.

 

Advantages: This advantages of the reformation plan are:

 

1.  It puts the problem in an “action mode” and defines a context and reference point for member input. It take a “solution oriented” approach to the situation.

 

2.  The plan deals with the key issues and allows for additional input from members while maintaining the need for the board to make the final decisions and take the actions necessary in order to perform their fiduciary duty.

 

3.  The plan provides an opportunity for some creative expression of ideas in the areas of programs and development of the Adelphi community. This will help to keep the group goal oriented which is important during a time a redefinition and re­evaluation of commitments.

 

Disadvantages: The disadvantages of this plan are mostly based upon membership reaction, in other words, politics. They are:

 

1.  Some people may feel threatened by the board taking an active and affirmative position on these issues resulting on attacks on the boards intentions or accusations of “rail-roading” the matter. It can be pointed out that the board desires to operate Adelphi in a more straight forward, democratic fashion.

 

2.  Some people may not like the shifting of attention from the “Richard issue” to resolution in that their hope may be to somehow use the process to keep Richard involved at some degree. It could be said that the board is acting out of line in saying that Richard has resigned and it’s time to move on. In this case, the facts (August 19th minutes)speak for themselves.

 

3.  Richard may use his remaining time to take some parting shots at the board(s) and suggest a reformation program of his own which may not address the corporation’s or the director’s legal responsibilities. This may just be a price for action and if it happens, we’ll just do our best to stay focused on the real issues.

 

Action: If the board approves of this format, the action steps are to:

 

1.           Advise Richard in writing on his membership status.

2.           Define each committee’s charter.

3.           Select people for each committee and see if they are interested in being on it (before the meeting).

4.           Draft a statement on the process for reading at the meeting.

5.           Develop a schedule.

6.           Review plan with Bill Elliott.

7.           Hold the meeting and review. Take input and modify the plan as needed.

8.           Committees to meet and make their recommendations to the board.

9.           Board to work the committee recommendations into the reformation plan for review with the membership.

10.       Membership meeting to review the reformation plan.

11.       Implement the plan.

12.       Keep membership advised.

 

*    *    *

 

 

Return