Why Can’t Mothers Work If They Have Children?

 

Question:   I understand you have a rule that women cannot work if they have children under eighteen years old.

 

Richard:    It is not so much a rule as a preference. In some cases in Stelle we must bend this rule. For instance, if a woman comes into The Stelle Group and she does not have a husband because of divorce or death, and yet she and her child are very worthy individuals with the child being well along in his school work and knowing how to behave towards other people, then it can be arranged for a substitute mother to guide the child in the school system so that the mother can work to support her child and herself. That happens to be a strain on us right at the moment because we do not have enough substitute mothers to go around. We bend according to the advantages that we can see for all concerned and we must balance to things as they really are, but we have a preference we will follow and we have good reasons for it.

 

Question:   Wouldn’t it be better if each individual woman decided for herself whether to work or not?

 

Richard:    Such a decision not only concerns this individual woman, but the economics of the community as well. If her working deprives the child so that he becomes a second class person in comparison to the other children, then having them in Stelle is of no advantage to anyone. Sociologically speaking, anyone who is going to be a problem to us later is not needed by Stelle at all. (12-1972)

 

 

Will Women in Lemuria Only Be Allowed Certain Jobs?

 

Question:      I noticed in reading your book something that puzzles me because the liberation of women in the last thirty, forty years in this country, and probably it’s spreading all over the world, is I noticed about this City of God after the turn of the century, when that’s formed, it seems like there’s a statement in there that’s contrary to everything that’s happening to women now. It implies that women are going to be nothing but wives and raising families and not working like they are now.

 

Richard:      Nothing but? I think people have been depending for a long, long time on good motherhood in order to —

 

Question:      I know, but how are you going to get women to change the way they are now when they are invading all kinds of things in society and different positions?

 

Richard:      I’m not going to try to do that. Not me. (05-19?? TAO)

 

 

 

Q:      I find it hard to reconcile some of the things that you said in The Ultimate Frontier about limitations on occupations for women and so on. Perhaps if women really find out what they are as women, they may even be allowed to what you consider to ??. You have to find out what you are not sometimes to find out what you are. And it seems to me that the limitations of what you say and do in this community ?? I cannot reconcile it with how you talk now—

 

RK:    I did not say that. Dr. White told me, and this refers to the Nation of God. One of the reasons for those limitations of women getting into the commercial aspects of the community is that there will be so little work to do because things are supposed to be so put together that items that you buy at the store in the way of furniture and automobiles and homes, what have, just go on and on and on for generations. They do not have to be replaced constantly as they are designed now. The system is not to be designed where everybody is running around like “chickens with their heads cutoff” trying to keep up with the basic necessities. Under those circumstances, it is stated that we should get back to the Lemurian economy was where the average work-week was twelve hours. Under those circumstances, there is barely enough for the wage earners to do, enough work to go around, so the women are, essentially, to be eliminated from the commercial aspects of “bringing home the bacon.”

 

That does not mean that women cannot gain the experience in practically anything they want to do as long as they do not do it for gain. Going to college is going to be a big item in most people’s lives. Under those circumstances, so much time was given to learning that much of it will be spent in the university where people can learn how to really understand about biology and nuclear physics and the healing arts, history, philosophy; to become truly acquainted with those ideas so they understand them.

 

Under the Lemurian system, and as I understand how we will have to work toward it in the new nation, that as a person develops himself to be in a public function—a governor or mayor, eventually working himself up to the possibility of being a candidate for governor of his province or maybe the head of the nation—that his wife has to go through the same special training that he does. This means up to about age thirty-five going to school so that she is also a part of that team; not just the man who is in the administrative position all by himself. His wife is also part of that and she must understand about all of the aspects of how that nation is to be run, how she is going to fit that in with rearing children and other questions. That will be one of the requirements. It is not to diminish the possibility of women doing the things that they want to do but to keep them out of factories and the stresses of the commercial situation so that they are in a better framework for rearing children which is by far the more important task than having a trade to earn a living.

 

In the first place, a woman, in all the kinds of things she does, generally develops a proficiency of many areas of living whereas a man concentrates on some specific trade. He may know everything there is to know about machining but she has to know all about properly rearing a child, things about nutrition so she and her children and husband are kept healthy; all the little chores that go along with running a household. There is far more scope and, let’s say, a broader opportunity to learn many kinds of things and bring them into balance as opposed to the guy who just does his one thing.

 

Women have tended to have been the arbiters of civilization. It seems like historically, the idealist of how civilization should be put together have been the men, but the ones who actually make it happen have been the women. I am not saying that is the role they should have but that is how it turned out. Whatever characteristics seemed to be developed by males as opposed to females that seems to be how it worked out. I do not know if anybody has ever imposed that or tried to grab those rules for themselves; it just seems that is inherent in the masculine and feminine characteristics.

 

So, what Dr. White and the best estimate of what He was trying to say was, don’t try to promote women in commerce. That is not where they are going to have their greatest strengths. Those are not the things they are going to be doing which is going to give them a better chance at fulfilling themselves as human Egos and serving mankind in the best way.

 

Q:      Other than that, how do reconcile the unfortunate thing that generally goes along with that sort of situation? Shouldn’t an Ego take advantage of things that are held up as the things that are most important? I think that the—and think that women end up doing because they don’t and not the commercialized ?? should be—

 

RK:    I think that results from men “blowing their horn.” They keep convincing themselves that this is really great stuff. But, you know, about two-hundred years ago, when most people were either farmers or involved in some cottage trade or cottage industry, they were home. They were with their children, with their wives all the time whatever they were doing. At least, they had the other ones around them. Now, they have to somehow bolster themselves and say, “Wow. This is really great. I go off early in the morning, I get up before my kids, I spend an hour getting to where I was going to go, do ridiculous things all day long that nobody can care about ten years from now, come back home fighting possible death on the freeways until you get back home again. By that time, the kids are cranky and ready to go to sleep, you have some kind of a hurried dinner with them, you have little fights with them, and then you sit and doze off in front of the television. Somehow, they have got to tell themselves—they have to convince themselves—that this is really a great thing and they are really excited to do this in order to kick themselves out of bed every morning. I don’t think they really want to do that. I think they would really prefer to be home and have some way by which to earn a living in the presence of their family where, instead of being divided from their wife for such a long period of time, she is always there: a friendly voice to talk to because generally you marry a friend, somebody who you can count on rather than having to be wary of what you say to every single person around you because they are possible competitors for the better paying jobs somewhere down the line. I think we are in a sick situation, and if we look at the idea of a Lemurian Philosophy and the Nation of God in the future and take with us our present views of modern life, it is going to look wrong to us.

 

It is going to require an entirely different viewpoint on the parts of men and women. Let’s say you have to start developing it here in Stelle so that we can go into the new Nation of God with a better appreciation of how men and women should be relating and it sure as heck is not supposed to be a commercial relationship: “I’m bringing in more money, you are bringing in more money or the one person who is working is bringing in enough.” The whole works has gotten distorted as a result of that. My generation, your generation, the younger generations around today, have all been brought up in the context of regarding the proper way of doing things in the most advanced, modern way of doing things in a highly industrialized society. I don’t think industrialization is entirely compatible with humanness.

 

I think we have to put commercial activities and industrial activities and technological activities in their proper place and it is not at the top. We can’t do without them. We would be greatly diminished if we do not have them. But, right now their importance looms too large in our consideration. It is going to take quite an important turn-around in our appreciation of what really matters. And what matters first is humanness. The kids should not be coming in somewhere forth or fifth down the line. They are supposed to be number two in a person’s life and their spouse is number one as far as persons are concerned and material considerations are concerned.

 

So far as spiritual considerations are concerned, I think one’s relationship to the Higher Beings such as Christ or God really takes top priority and few people have time to give the depth of consideration to that in our present society that they should have. So, we are looking forward to a different kind of thing. And then what Dr. White says, which sounds like harsh conscription now, then just comes across as, “Well, naturally,” but when you first read it in The Ultimate Frontier, it sounds pretty hot. (11-1981)

 

 

 

 

Return