Volume I, No. 9

 

THE LITTLE THINGS

 

THE LITTLE CHEF

Adam is a blond-haired seventeen-month-old with inquiring eyes and an expressive face. Lost in the joy of the moment, he dashes through the living room using his feet to dribble a seven-inch ball. As he maneuvers around the corner into the dining room, a distraction in the kitchen causes him to stop.

 

His mother, Carolyn, is preparing to make spaghetti sauce and that’s a project Adam’s not about to miss. Carolyn readies him with a full-length bib, and he climbs upon a step-stool to accept his role as chef.

 

Zealously, he hand-squeezes the tomatoes while Carolyn browns some ground beef. Carolyn expresses her appreciation at Adam’s efforts by commenting, you’re helping Mommy.”

 

Once Adam has “pureed” the tomatoes, he helps his mother push his stool in front of the stove. Then, protected from hot splatters by his bib, he adds premeasured spices and tomatoes to the simmering meat.

 

Absorbed in the delight of stirring, his enthusiasm is incredibly contagious. It seems nothing could make him happier — until his father walks in and inspires Adam’s biggest smile by asking, “What’s for dinner, Adam?”

 

MOMMY’S HELPER

Adam has been actively involved in the routine since he was very tiny. As soon as he was old enough to grasp and release objects, he was allowed to “help Mourn? by dropping soaks into the washing machine. Later he was able to move the dirty clothes from the hamper to the wash basket. Now he removes all 0±’ the clothes from the laundry basket and loads them in the washer, even adding the premeasured detergent.

 

Adam is also the official plant waterer, a job which he’s had since he was eight months old. His watering cup is so tiny that it takes five refills to water one plant, but he has fun with the process and hasn’t drowned a plant yet!

 

This interest in horticulture was similarly developed at an early age. When Adam was an infant, Carolyn, carried him on her hip as she watered the plants. She told him the name of each plant as “they” watered it, as well as showing him printed words relating to what they were doing. Having enjoyed looking at word cards since he was two weeks old, Adam liked seeing his interests printed on cards.

 

After showing Adam many words on individual cards, Carolyn started writing phrases using words Adam had already seen. When she first wrote the phrase “Let’s water the plants,” she told Adam what it said and put the card away. The second time she pulled out the phrase, Adam ran to get his watering can before she even had time to tell him what the card said! That was a pretty exciting day!

 

They do caution that such responses from little ones are often inconsistent, though, and that it’s best just to accept them when they happen. Trying to force a young child to prove what he knows through constant testing can bore or frustrate the child, and take all of the joy out of learning.

 

A WORLD OF TREASURES

Although Bert and Carolyn have invested money in children’s books, cassette tapes, bits and cards for teaching words and numbers, many of their purchases have consisted of easily acquired household items. Each room in the house has a container filled with common and inexpensive learning tools.

 

For instance, a dishpan in the bathroom contains bottles with screw-on lids, wooden spoons, stainless steel measuring cups, a natural sponge, a rubber duck and a wind-up seal that swims. Adam chooses several items before he gets in the bathtub, naturally limiting the number of items. The bathtub, incidentally, is also Adam’s art activity area, and aids cleanup after projects such as finger-painting.

 

A hand-woven basket in Bert and Carolyn’s bedroom is filled with blocks, balls, dolls, little toys and soft objects. Next to this is a dresser which displays two small boxes called the “treasure chests.” Adam has to ask his parents to hand these to him.

 

Whenever Adam reaches for something on the dresser, his parents distract him with these treasured boxes. Locks, poker chips, chains, costume jewelry and smaller boxes constitute the valuables, which for Adam are very special.

 

An attractive basket in the dining room holds bottles, lids and clothespins. Adam likes to listen to the sound he makes by shaking the clothespins in the bottles. Since he finds it difficult to pour the clothespins out, his mother gives him dried beans to practice pouring.

 

A corner cabinet in the kitchen houses “Adam’s pots and pans,” a collection of cookware reserved for camping trips and imaginary cooking sessions. Adam moves this cooking gear into the living room whenever he’s in the mood to play gourmet. He tosses plastic letters into the pots and makes one of his favorite creations, alphabet soup. Sparing no gesture, he lifts his wooden spoon toward his father’s nose, encouraging him to smell the delectable soup he’s “cooking.”

 

Two shelves of the living room bookcase also indicate Adam’s presence in the home. Anything of recent interest to Adam is kept there within his reach, and an adhesive nametag labels the place for each object. When Adam requests that his parents read to him, he chooses a book from one of these shelves and brings it to them.

 

THE BALANCE

While Bert and Carolyn enjoy responding to Adam’s dependencies with lots of cuddling and kisses, they also help him develop independence by allowing him to do things for himself. When Adam requests something that he might well enjoy getting himself, Bert and Carolyn tell him how to find it; “Your blue ball is beside the jade plant in the living room. Would you please bring it to us?”

 

In following these directions, Adam tests his understanding of his expanding vocabulary. This reinforces his recognition of the names of household items, as well as develops his understanding of concepts such as under, over, beside, on top of, beneath and around.

 

TIME WITH DAD

When Bert gets home from work, Carolyn tells him about her day with Adam, then Bert spends some time with him. When Adam was very tiny, Bert used to entertain him by making all of the basic sounds in English and foreign languages. (Bert has a linguistics background.)

 

Now it’s more common for Bert and Adam to go to the park to practice jumping. Although there is a balance beam in Adam’s room, they enjoy walking to the perk when the weather’s inviting. Bert will join Adam in standing on a beam as be says, “Ready?” At this, he and Adam bend their knees. Then Bert says, “Jump!” and jumps off the beam. Adam follows by saying, “Yump!” and steps off the beam. This fun is repeated many times before they head home to share a bath.

 

At home, Adam helps Bert empty the household trash. (Adam started emptying trash cans when he was about nine months old.) He carries the little baskets from the bedrooms into the kitchen and empties the trash into the bigger garbage bag. Then be returns the little baskets to their proper places. Bert and Carolyn let Adam help with any trash which they don’t mind having spilled, allowing Adam the pleasure of helping with “one of Daddy’s jobs.”

 

This lifestyle illustrates that many rich educational experiences can be created without costly equipment. This isn’t to deny the value of commercial learning tools, but to serve as a reminder to make better use of what we have. Children enjoy the useful things in life as much as a shiny toy. They have a great appreciation of the wonders of life, and the simple things bring them much joy.

 

 

Basic

Principles

 

 

   PART THREE  

 

 

THE RELATION BETWEEN DEPENDENCE AND DEVELOPMENT

 

Ideally, during the first several years of life any separations of a child from his mother are initiated and ended by the child.

 

Practically, there can be situations in which even the most warmly dependable mother may have to separate herself from her young child for a short time.

 

If these occur, there are several steps she can take to minimize any ill effects of the separation on her child.

 

Significantly, the optimal conditions for such a (mother-caused) separation are the same conditions that foster strong attachment

 

IDEALLY, …

Let’s say that a certain (ideal) husband and wife are new parents of a baby son. They have studied child development. They understand that the quality of their child’s early dependence on his mother is his first, deepest definition of what the world is like and what part he plays in it. They decide to arrange their lives for the next six years so that at least one of them is always available to their child, the wife almost continuously during the nursing year(s), the husband as frequently as possible from birth on.

 

They simplify their lives by understanding that everyday routines now take twice as long. Interestingly, they may go out as much now as before becoming parents, but with their son, a different attitude, and a different tempo. Now they are always orienting their child to what’s going on around him, giving him time and means to explore, teaching behavior appropriate to differing situations, letting him learn first about new people and new places from the safety of their presence.

 

They remain available for him to be dependent on as long as he needs to be. They don’t prolong these years, they just make them secure.

 

...  THE CHILD LEAVES THE PARENTS AS HE IS READY.

At a few months old their son stretches and pulls his body away from his mother’s, wanting to see more, knowing she’ll hold him safely. In a few more months that same child is creeping and then walking away, a few feet, a few yards, then dashing back to make sure she’s where he left her. Between 18 and 36 months checking-in-on-Mommy moments may become less frequent and briefer. As he finds she’s always there when he checks, he may need fewer checks.

 

By around the third birthday, a child — especially one whose relationship with his mother has been very harmonious and very dependable — has developed the ability to imagine his mother even when she’s not physically present, to mentally carry her around with him so effectively that her physical absence for a few hours, under optimal conditions, may not create distress.

 

From about three to six years old this ability to image an internal mother is tested. When parents continue to allow their child freedom but remain warmly present when needed, the ability is strengthened and extended. By six or seven the child of these ideal parents is a self-reliant, competent individual. He has emerged from what Gilbert Kliman (in Responsible Parenthood) calls “the six-year pregnancy.”

 

PRACTICALLY, …

That’s the ideal. In current Western culture, however, there are few if any ideal parents — although there are many exceptional ones. Very few of us have decided, yet, to rearrange our lives so that one parent is always available to our child throughout the first six years. Many of us leave our child for short periods during those years, not always waiting for his readiness to be apart. Sometimes we ask not whether to leave our children but how, not what’s ideal but what’s optimal for who and where we are right now.

 

… THERE ARE OPTIMAL CONDITIONS FOR PARENT-CHILD SEPARATIONS.

Significantly, the answer is to create for our children the conditions under which they can form an attachment to the person taking care of them while we are away. That is, if we love them, we set up the situation in which they can more easily learn to love and feel loved by someone else.

 

We find one caretaker who is familiar to our child, a warm nurturing person who capably fills the mothering function and provides an abundance of stimulation. Finding interesting, active things for a child to do is the old babysitter’s ploy; keep the child so happily occupied that he doesn’t have time to think of absent parents. It is a kind ploy, and it works. It also helps a child develop an attachment to the person stimulating or teaching him. In The Growth of Sociability, H. R. Schaffer reports that mothers who give their children a great deal of attention have a closer bond with them than do mothers who interact with their children only when giving routine care~ He also found that infants who had rather unstimulating mothers and very attentive fathers were more attached to the father than to the mother, with whom they spent more time! Having a single, dependable caretaker who warmly stimulates our child may be the essential factor in optimal separations.

 

There are additional factors, though, that are important. Keeping the child in familiar surroundings can be helpful, as can having brothers or sisters with him. The presence of even a very young sibling can help relieve the anxiety of a stressful separation. And recent research shows that two-year-olds who have to be away from their mothers for a while seem to experience less stress if they have a picture and/or vocal recording of their mother.

 

Other research shows that attachment is strongest to mothers who respond whenever their infant cries. Presumably this holds true for anyone else who cares for your child. In fact, just being very sensitive to a baby’s signals and responding to him as an individual can foster attachment.

 

Much of this, of course, is just common sense to many parents, and even, for some, is common practice. In the days of extended families with live—in grandparents, these optimal conditions for separations were often naturally available if needed. Often now they are available only with great forethought and creativity by parents; so it is interesting to observe the increasing numbers of these thoughtful, creative parents who have decided to settle for nothing less. They are couples who see separation from his parents as a serious event in their young child’s life; who are learning to value and encourage the parenting, nurturing parts of themselves; who find that becoming thoroughly dependable parents not only serves their child’s highest promise but can be used to greatly enrich and deepen their own growth as well. J.C.

 

 

TO MOTHER IS TO TEACH

 

DEAR NANCY,

 

(Below is part of a letter from reader Nancy of Wisconsin, with part of my reply. I thought the exchange on teaching phonics and the alphabet might be of interest to many of you.)

________________

 

Dear Kelly,

 

I see in a few of the articles your mothers (at Stelle) start phonics and alphabet teaching early — 6 to 9 months was recommended in one article.

 

At my training at the BBI* they said phonics is one of the rules kids will intuit. And on a personal level, I’ve seen this happen with a friend’s child (at 3 yrs. old). They (BBl) also say knowing the alphabet can actually be an obstacle to teaching reading, since the kids may look for letters rather than words.

 

I guess what I want to know is do you have some information I don’t know about or have I misunderstood something here. I sort of feel like why teach them something they will intuit and understand so beautifully on their own.

 

Thanks for any clarification you could give me.

 

Sincerely, Nancy

________________

 

Dear Nancy,

 

Thank you for your letter to Parenting for Excellence.

 

We encourage our parents to teach their babies the alphabet so the children will be able to alphabetize — find words in the dictionary, look up numbers in the phone book, etc. That’s a survival skill in this culture, and it’s based on memorization, which is easiest for very young children.

 

Learning the alphabet has no necessary connection with learning to read as far as we can tell.

 

It is important to know, though, for learning how to write, since words have to be written a letter at a time. We suggest that mothers gently hold their babies’ fingers and trace the letters in a tray of cornmeal, giving children the “muscle memory” of each letter, and so facilitating writing. While doing the tracing, the adult would, of course, be telling the child the name of each letter.

 

At the same time, when paging through alphabet books, mothers could tell their young children the sounds of the letters. Just as children enjoy learning that a pig can make the sound “oink,” they like knowing that a C can make the sounds “k” or “s”. That’s just another “bit of intelligence” for the child that can be helpful in spelling, pronunciation of new words, and in conversations with young friends who learned to read later in life (five or six or so) by using phonics. We agree that most young readers will intuit most of the rules of phonics and that it’s not necessary for them to know phonics to be good readers or spellers. We have found that a knowledge of phonics is helpful to some children, appealing to some more than others. It seems fair to us to give all our children the information — along with all the other information we give them — to be sure they have it clearly and completely.

 

You also mentioned the idea that learning the alphabet could be an obstacle to tiny readers, causing them to look at individual letters rather than the whole word. That seems logical — especially if the mother teaching them the alphabet thinks she is teaching reading — but so far. I haven’t observed that result in the children here. They learn reading, and talking, and the alphabet, and phonics, and writing, and it appears that all those aspects of language reinforce and build on each other.

 

Thanks, Nancy, for writing.

 

Sincerely, Joanna

 

* The Better Baby Institute of Philadelphia.

 

 

PARENTING FOR EXCELLENCE — Volume I, No. 9 — December 1981

 

Parenting for Excellence is published ten times per year by The Stelle Group. Subscriptions are sold by the volume, with volumes beginning in January. Subscription rates are $15 for one year, and queries about subscriptions and delivery should be sent to The Stelle Group, Administration Building, Stelle, Illinois 60919, or you may telephone: (815) 949-1111. Up to 250 words may be quoted if Parenting for Excellence is given credit and The Stelle Group’s address is included.

 

 

 

 

Return