Are the Teachings of Gurdgieff and Ouspenski Valid?

 

Gurdgieff, Ouspenski, and Blavatsky are names sometimes mentioned by visitors to the monthly meetings. A question regarding the validity of Gurdgieff’s writings was raised:

          

Richard:  Gurdgieff and Ouspenski had been taught by Indian students of schools originally founded by the Brahmic Brotherhood. What these two authors wrote is heavily laced with the Hindu concepts conveyed by their contacts. Their writings are in a sort of “stream of consciousness” mode as each conjectures and argues with himself about the nature of the information he is struggling to understand. As men exploring many possibilities of interpretation, they make reference to personally untried concepts which are sometimes true and sometimes false.

 

One of the problems encountered by the Russian writers in trying to convey their message was that of translating the information from the Indian dialects. During the 300 years that Russia and England contended for the Khyber Pass, there was considerable travel and communication between Russians and Indians. Wandering Indian philosophers brought the teachings of the Indian schools to Russia and gave rise to Russian metaphysical schools of thought similar to Theosophy in England. Today it is difficult to separate the Indian schools’ philosophy from Hinduism, Brahminism, and individual opinion. Teachers and translators inevitably modify the original message of a phil­osophy in their attempts to make sense of it, and their students are influenced accordingly. (12-1969)

 

 

 

Return