|
||
|
Parenting by Richard Kieninger The Brotherhoods inform us
that the proper rearing of children is essential to the progress and
maintenance of a high level of civilization. Based on millennia of
observation and experience in Lemuria and other advanced cultures, it became
obvious to the Brotherhoods that only highly developed individuals can
comprise a highly developed civilization. It is mandatory that if a culture
is to produce Initiates in large numbers, it must devote much of its
attention and energy to the maximization of the potentials of each succeeding
generation. Each child must receive optimum support and training if he is to
be neurologically, emotionally and psychologically fulfilled and have the
best chance at becoming intellectually bright and creative—his intelligence
is directly proportional to all these factors. We have been given specific
guidelines by the Brotherhoods to help guarantee that children enjoy the
highest probability of attaining full use of their brains and can thus help
advance civilization at the fastest pace possible. These guidelines emphasize
the necessity of the complete devotion of each set of parents and of the
whole community to the education of Adelphi children. We have been encouraged
to detect the faults in our culture’s attitudes and in our personal makeups
so that we can avoid passing along destructive tendencies to the next
generation. The Brotherhoods have stated every mother must be supported
financially and emotionally by a loving husband so that she can devote all
the attention appropriate to her children’s education and fulfillment of
their natural needs. Citizens are asked not to
marry too young and are enjoined by the Brotherhoods from having children
until they establish their marital compatibility for at least three years
together. The parents’ maturity and their personal skills at maintaining a
happy, successful life is of great importance to the healthy maturing of
their offspring. A wife is expected to not have a child unless she is
prepared and willing to personally lavish six years of intense, dedicated
education on each infant and provide continual active support of each of her
children for twelve years thereafter. Parents are expected to space their
children at least six years apart because each child is entitled to exclusive
upbringing by his parents during the first six years of life when the great
majority of his lifetime’s attitudes, morality, and intelligence will be
established unalterably. As in Lemuria, families should be limited to two
children, and at most have three. Intelligence testing of
hundreds of thousands of people and matching their scores with their birth
order in their family has demonstrated that one’s intelligence declines with
family size. The fewer the children in your family, the smarter you are
likely to be; and the fewer older siblings you have, the brighter you are
likely to be. The relationship between birth order and intelligence proved to
be independent of social class. When the first child is born into a family,
he is reared by two adults. The second child is reared by two adults and a
child, who has far less than adult intelligence. As each subsequent child is
born, the intellectual environment of the family as an average deteriorates.
The pool of intellectual capacity from which each subsequent child may draw
diminishes drastically. The larger the family, the more time each child
spends in a world of child-sized minds. A variable which ameliorates this dilution
of intelligence is to increase the length of time between births so that
each preceding child can have more time to develop a higher percentage of his
adult mental capacity. With very large gaps between children, the study
showed that the negative effects of birth order on intelligence reverses. Having children only two or
three years apart detracts from parents’ ability to maintain a close,
one-to-one teaching relationship with the young child. The Brotherhoods
insist that a child must be taught to read by his parents by his third
birthday and to write by the time he Is four years old. Then follows an even
more intensive education program by the parents with close emotional bonding
for the next two years. The child is thus prepared by age six to move into
the larger world with confidence and in possession of all the basic tools of
learning. Every genius in this world was the recipient of just such attention
from a caring adult. Of course, if the parents are social misfits or
emotionally immature, the budding genius will probably also absorb the
inadequacies of the teacher. Having a brother or sister
only two or three years different in age generates a rivalry which is
essentially destructive. Some people think it useful to have children close together
in age so they can be companions and play together, but the jealousies
inherent in such similar age groupings do more harm than good. The learned
habits of contentiousness, competition, anger, and mutual wariness continue
into adulthood. If it is the parents’ intention to mostly ignore their young
children and abandon their earliest education to television and the
neighbors’ kids, then perhaps having one’s own sibling for constant
togetherness is of some emotional value, but it is unquestionably destructive
to the intelligence of the children and, interestingly enough, tends to
diminish the intellectual ability of the mother. Evidence indicates that
parents must be almost constantly available during the child’s first six
years to provide stimulation and support. These are the most critical years
of development of the intellect. If a mother is immersed in other concerns,
she may be insensitive to her baby’s needs. This creates a condition counter
to the development of basic trust and normal emotional and intellectual
progress. Psychological inventories
and studies of interpersonal relationships in adults have shown that a child
who is reared without siblings is as likely to be free of neurosis and be as
happy as anyone else. The only child has all the advantages of being the
first born as well as the baby of the family, except that he can’t have the
intelligence-building opportunity of having a younger sibling he can help
teach. The only child is not any more likely to be brooding or lonely than anyone
else; rather he responds more openly to cooperative moves from other people
and is more trusting than adults who grew up with brothers and sisters.
Moreover, the only child is more independent, tends toward leadership, is
more reliable, has a better verbal IQ, and is more adult-like in behavior.
However, the stereotype expressed by persons who have siblings is that the
only child must be lonely, unhappy and maladjusted. That view might be due to
parental propaganda to make one glad to have a brother or sister. In families where children
are spaced six to ten years apart, each child is allowed the opportunity to
be reared almost like an only child. With a minimum of six years between
them, siblings are not competing for the same kinds of parental attention,
and they are not squabbling over sharing the same kinds of toys at the same
time. A ten-year-old child is more tolerant of and can actually be loving
toward a four-year-old sibling who is no competition in his league. The
kindnesses and hero worship between such children is mostly beneficial. The Brotherhoods are most
concerned that every factor which can contribute toward the probability of
sure advancement of the human race be understood and practiced, at least in the
Nation of God. |
|
|
|
|